Review of Andrew Irvine and John Russell (eds.), In the Agora: The Public Face of Canadian Philosophy
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
The three-model screen
all 1,000 screened works →All three models called this out of scope.
Book review of an edited volume on the public face of Canadian philosophy; commentary on Canadian scholars' public engagement, with no abstract to judge depth.
This is a review of a book about Canadian philosophy, not a study of research practice.
Book review of a volume on Canadian public philosophy; commentary, not analytic metaresearch.
Abstract
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database — OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
The record
- Venue
- University of Toronto Quarterly
- Topic
- Canadian Identity and History
- Field
- Social Sciences
- Canadian institutions
- —
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- AgoraFace (sociological concept)ClassicsArt historyPhilosophyHistoryEnvironmental ethicsLinguisticsComputer scienceProgramming language
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- no