Sindrome serotoninergica: perché anche il cardiologo la dovrebbe conoscere (e temere)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The serotonin syndrome (SS) represents a life-threatening adverse drug reaction, caused by serotonin overload in the central and peripheral nervous system, producing autonomic instability, neuromuscular and cardiovascular abnormalities, and cognitive alterations. The incidence of SS has been growing over the last few years, as a consequence of population aging and the steadily increasing use of pro-serotoninergic agents in clinical practice, in the presence of various comorbidities, mainly cardiovascular. Cardiologists often use combination therapies including serotoninergic agents, and should therefore consider the risk of serotoninergic adverse events caused by inappropriate drug interactions. SS is often difficult to diagnose and may be life-threatening if not adequately managed. Considering the several published case reports of overdose or not recommended associations, a greater awareness by clinicians about the potential risks associated with inappropriate use of these drugs is needed, as well as better information on the clinical features and therapeutic approaches to SS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".