The Near Boiling Reactor: Design of a Small, Inherently Safe, Nuclear Reactor to Extend the Operational Envelope of the Victoria-Class Submarine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present work aims at initiating the conceptual design of a small nuclear reactor intended to provide sufficient electrical power (˜150 kW) to maintain the “hotel” load of the Victoria-class submarine and extend her operational envelope. The scope of the design is to provide the nuclear reactor system with sufficient inherent safety features as to permit the operation of the nuclear reactor by crews with minimal training for automatic operation. Several constraints provide the framework for carrying out the design work, such as, among others, maintaining the excess reactivity of the reactor at safe values at all times, providing enough fuel and reactivity for meeting operational requirements, and keeping the size of the reactor core and shielding such as to fit within the hull of the existing vessel.The final reactor concept, named the Near Boiling reactor, employs TRISO fuel particles in zirconium-sheathed fuel rods. The reactor is light water moderated and cooled. The core life is specifically designed to coincide with the refit cycle of the Victoria-class submarine. The reactor employs a simple and reliable control and shutdown system that requires little intervention on the part of the submarine’s crew. Also, a kinetic model is developed that demonstrates the inherent safety features of the reactor during several accident scenarios. The low steady-state flux level of the reactor during normal operation results in very low negative reactivity after shutdown and eliminates any reactor dead time. The reactor is designed for automatic unattended control and does not require extensive training for its operators.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".