MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W130160586

Internet banking in the united kingdom: a customer behaviour perspective

2005· article· en· W130160586 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John Pallister, Gordon R. Foxall, Anna Kaleka, Shumaila Yousafzai

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRisk perceptionThe InternetStructural equation modelingPsychologyTechnology acceptance modelConstruct (python library)Test (biology)Perspective (graphical)PerceptionConceptual modelTrustworthinessAntecedent (behavioral psychology)Set (abstract data type)UsabilitySocial psychologyMarketingBusinessComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The primary objective of this thesis is to develop a conceptual model that determines how intentions towards the use of internet banking are formed and to what extent they are related to the actual use of internet banking. The thesis also examines the role of customers' trust in internet banking acceptance and the perceptual differences among customers on the basis of their technology readiness and demographic characteristics of gender and age. The thesis integrates variables associated with behavioural and environmental uncertainty (trust and perceived risk), technology acceptance constructs (perceived usefulness and ease of use), and users' personal characteristics (technology readiness, age and gender) into a coherent and parsimonious model. The structural equation modelling technique is used to rigorously test the validation of measurement models and to examine the extensive set of interrelationships among these variables and their comparative effect on customers' intentions and actual use of internet banking. The data used is collected in collaboration with Halifax Bank of Scotland (HBOS) through postal questionnaire survey and actual internet banking usage logs of the respondents. The empirical results show that: (1) intentions translate over time into actual behaviour; (2) perceived usefulness has a significant effect on intentions; (3) trust and perceived risk are direct antecedents of intention, suggesting uncertainty reduction as a key component in customers' acceptance of internet banking; (4) trust also acts as an indirect antecedent of intention through perceived risk and perceived usefulness; (5) trust is a multidimensional construct: perceived trustworthiness, perceived security, perceived privacy are antecedents of trust; (6) perceived trustworthiness significantly affects perceived security and perceived privacy; (7) different types of customers, defined by their demographic characteristics and technology readiness, develop different perceptions towards the same technology. Overall, the thesis indicates that while Technology Acceptance Model (TAM: Davis 1989) is useful in explaining internet banking acceptance, extending the theory to include the combined effect of new variables and moderators increases our understanding of the underlying phenomenon. User acceptance of technology remains a complex, elusive, yet extremely important phenomenon. Research on the TAM starting from Davis in 1989 has made significant contributions toward unravelling some of its mysteries. The internet banking acceptance model, proposed and validated in this thesis, advances theory and research on this important issue. Keywords. Internet Banking, United Kingdom, Customer Behaviour, Technology Acceptance Model, Trust, Perceived Risk, Perceived Security, Perceived Privacy, Perceived Trustworthiness, Technology Readiness, Structural Equation Modelling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.197
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourFrench-language works237,207