CANOE: A Broadband Array in Northwestern Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Canadian Northwest Experiment (or CANOE) is a nearly sixty broadband-instrument array extending from the Slave Craton in the Canadian NWT, across the Canadian Rockies in northern British Columbia and Yukon and south to Edmonton Alberta where the FLED (Florida to Edmonton) PASSCAL array terminated (Figure 1). The array crosses 4 Ga of geologic time and a series of compressive orogens undisrupted by later periods of extension or extensive hotspot volcanism. Coupled with excellent shallow structural control from Lithoprobe active-source transects, CANOE offers an unparalleled window into deep continental lithosphere structural expression and history. The array also offers excellent deep-mantle sampling of the central Pacific and Hawaii. A subset of the array was installed in May, 2003. The remaining two-thirds of the array were deployed in May and June of 2004 and will remain until October, 2005. Array endpoints are anchored by permanent stations of the CNSN that are available through the IRIS DMC; typical station spacing within the array is less than 50 km. Data are recorded continuously at 20 samples per second on a mixture of Guralp 3T, 3ESP and 40T instruments. Instruments for CANOE were provided by PASSCAL/IRIS. The members of CANOE wish to thank the PASSCAL Team for training, extensive field assistance and critical logistical support.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".