MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W130599577

Collaborative Sovereignty: The Visionary Work of American Indian and Canadian Aboriginal Young Adult Literature

2013· article· en· W130599577 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenCommons - UConn (University of Connecticut) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicThemes in Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSovereigntyWork (physics)Political scienceGender studiesSociologyLawPoliticsEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation theorizes the concept collaborative sovereignty, a term coined by the author, as a unique approach to Indigenous self-determination represented across a body of contemporary young adult fiction by American Indian and Canadian Aboriginal writers. These texts, published between 1985 and 2007, include Sherman Alexie’s The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian, Jeannette Armstrong’s Slash, Joseph Bruchac’s The Heart of a Chief, Susan Power’s “Drum Kiss” and “Reunion,” Cynthia Leitich Smith’s Rain is Not My Indian Name and “A Real-Live Blond Cherokee and His Equally Annoyed Soul Mate,” Drew Hayden Taylor’s The Night Wanderer: A Native Gothic Novel, and Melissa Tantaquidgeon Zobel’s Oracles.\nCollaborative sovereignty encompasses a commitment to a set of primary and secondary tenets. The primary tenets are: 1) Indigenous self-determination (including over governance, education, culture, and representation) and resistance to colonialist threats to self-determination; 2) the internal strengthening of Indigenous communities through their investment in specific tribal/intertribal cultural practices, relationships, and responsibilities; and 3) the mutual empowerment of Indigenous individuals and their communities. The secondary tenets include: 1) dialogue with multiple diverse voices; 2) dynamic development; 3) self-reflection/self-critique; and 4) alliances across tribal, national, and racial lines. While other scholars in Native Studies have discussed these tenets, the texts examined here distinctively bring these ideas together and provocatively develop them, in part through their adaptation of the conventions and adolescent spaces of young adult literature.\nThis project offers an intervention in several areas. It advances conversations in Native Literary Studies about the meaning of Indigenous sovereignty as well as related issues concerning decolonization, cultural continuance, and alliances. It also opens new approaches to questions about identity, authenticity, and appropriation. For Young Adult Literary Studies, the project broadly expands understandings of power dynamics in the genre while also complicating approaches to the YA subgenres of school stories, romance narratives, and speculative fiction. Finally, through its consideration of the challenges that collaborative sovereignty poses for the discourses of adolescence, multiculturalism, colonialist heteropatriarchy, and hybridity, the project offers multiple and significant interventions to a range of fields under the wide umbrella of Literary and Cultural Studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.640
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it