MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W130599577

Collaborative Sovereignty: The Visionary Work of American Indian and Canadian Aboriginal Young Adult Literature

2013· article· en· W130599577 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mandy Suhr-Sytsma

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenCommons - UConn (University of Connecticut) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicThemes in Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSovereigntyWork (physics)Political scienceGender studiesSociologyLawPoliticsEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation theorizes the concept collaborative sovereignty, a term coined by the author, as a unique approach to Indigenous self-determination represented across a body of contemporary young adult fiction by American Indian and Canadian Aboriginal writers. These texts, published between 1985 and 2007, include Sherman Alexie’s The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian, Jeannette Armstrong’s Slash, Joseph Bruchac’s The Heart of a Chief, Susan Power’s “Drum Kiss” and “Reunion,” Cynthia Leitich Smith’s Rain is Not My Indian Name and “A Real-Live Blond Cherokee and His Equally Annoyed Soul Mate,” Drew Hayden Taylor’s The Night Wanderer: A Native Gothic Novel, and Melissa Tantaquidgeon Zobel’s Oracles. Collaborative sovereignty encompasses a commitment to a set of primary and secondary tenets. The primary tenets are: 1) Indigenous self-determination (including over governance, education, culture, and representation) and resistance to colonialist threats to self-determination; 2) the internal strengthening of Indigenous communities through their investment in specific tribal/intertribal cultural practices, relationships, and responsibilities; and 3) the mutual empowerment of Indigenous individuals and their communities. The secondary tenets include: 1) dialogue with multiple diverse voices; 2) dynamic development; 3) self-reflection/self-critique; and 4) alliances across tribal, national, and racial lines. While other scholars in Native Studies have discussed these tenets, the texts examined here distinctively bring these ideas together and provocatively develop them, in part through their adaptation of the conventions and adolescent spaces of young adult literature. This project offers an intervention in several areas. It advances conversations in Native Literary Studies about the meaning of Indigenous sovereignty as well as related issues concerning decolonization, cultural continuance, and alliances. It also opens new approaches to questions about identity, authenticity, and appropriation. For Young Adult Literary Studies, the project broadly expands understandings of power dynamics in the genre while also complicating approaches to the YA subgenres of school stories, romance narratives, and speculative fiction. Finally, through its consideration of the challenges that collaborative sovereignty poses for the discourses of adolescence, multiculturalism, colonialist heteropatriarchy, and hybridity, the project offers multiple and significant interventions to a range of fields under the wide umbrella of Literary and Cultural Studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score0.975

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.008
Science and technology studies0.1050.073
Scholarly communication0.0250.008
Open science0.0050.014
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenCommons - UConn (University of Connecticut)Same topicThemes in Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207