Les droits linguistiques au Nouveau-Brunswick: pour une égalité réelle entre les langues officielles et les communautés de langues officielles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Por razones historicas, los derechos linguisticos ocupan un lugar importante en Canada. La situacion politica y linguistica particular del Quebec y su estatus como unica provincia francofona del pais son bien conocidos en la escena internacional. Sin embargo, pocas personas conocen la situacion linguistica de la provincia de Nouveau-Brunswick, situada en la costa atlantica del Canada, que posee un estatuto particular en el aspecto linguistico ya que es la unica que ha aceptado reconocer la igualdad de estatus, derecho y privilegio no solo de las dos lenguas oficiales, sino tambien de las dos comunidades linguisticas oficiales. En su texto, el autor presenta la situacion constitucional linguistica particular de esta provincia del Canada intentando comprender los motivos que pueden llevar a un estado o a una provincia a reconocer para su minoria ciertos derechos en el ambito linguistico.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".