MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W13093665 · doi:10.1042/bj0550204

Toward better scoring metrics for pseudo-independent models: Research Articles

2004· article· en· W13093665 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceHeuristicDimension (graph theory)Artificial intelligenceHypercubeDomain (mathematical analysis)Perspective (graphical)Machine learningTheoretical computer scienceAlgorithmMathematicsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Learning belief networks from data is NP-hard in general. A common method used in heuristic learning is the single-link lookahead search. When the problem domain is pseudo-independent (PI), the method cannot discover the underlying probabilistic model. In learning these models, to explicitly trade model accuracy and model complexity, parameterization of PI models is necessary. Understanding of PI models also provides a new dimension of trade-off in learning even when the underlying model may not be PI. In this work, we adopt a hypercube perspective to analyze PI models and derive an improved result for computing the maximum number of parameters needed to specify a full PI model. We also present results on parameterization of a subclass of partial PI models. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Int Syst 19: 749–768, 2004.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score0.629

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.262
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.123 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it