MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W131261927

Are Honor Killings Simply Domestic Violence

2009· article· en· W131261927 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Phyllis Chesler

Bibliographic record

VenueMiddle East Quarterly · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTerrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHonorWifeDomestic violenceNothingLawIslamCriminologyDenialSociologyPolitical scienceHistoryPoison controlPsychologySuicide preventionMedicinePsychoanalysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On February 12, 2009, Muzzammil Hassan informed police that he had beheaded his wife. Hassan had emigrated the United States 30 years ago and, after a successful banking career, had founded Bridges TV, a Muslim-interest network which aims, according its website, to foster a greater understanding among many cultures and diverse populations. Erie County district attorney Frank A. Sedita III told The Buffalo News that this is the worst form of domestic violence possible, andKhalid Qazi, president of the Muslim Public Affairs Council of Western New York, told the New York Post that Islam forbid such domestic violence. While Muslim advocacy organizations argue that honor killings are a misnomer stigmatizing Muslims for what is simply domestic violence, a problem that has nothing do with religion, Phyllis Chesler, who just completed a study of more than 50 instances of North American honor killings, says the evidence suggests otherwise. - The Editors Published in the Spring 2009 Middle East Quarterly, pp. 61-69. by Phyllis Chesler When a husband murders a wife or daughter in the United States and Canada, too often law enforcement chalks the matter up domestic violence. Murder is murder; religion is irrelevant. Honor killings are, however, distinct from wife battering and child abuse. Analysis of more than fifty reported honor killings shows they differ significantly from more common domestic violence.1 The frequent argument made by Muslim advocacy organizations that honor killings have nothing do with Islam and that it is discriminatory differentiate between honor killings and domestic violence is wrong. Background and Denial Families that kill for honor will threaten girls and women if they refuse cover their hair, their faces, or their bodies or act as their family's domestic servant; wear makeup or Western clothing; choose friends from another religion; date; seek obtain an advanced education; refuse an arranged marriage; seek a divorce from a violent husband; marry against their parents' wishes; or behave in ways that are considered too independent, which might mean anything from driving a car spending time or living away from home or family. Fundamentalists of many religions may expect their women meet some but not all of these expectations. But when women refuse do so, Jews, Christians, and Buddhists are far more likely shun rather than murder them. Muslims, however, do kill for honor, as do, a lesser extent, Hindus and Sikhs. The United Nations Population Fund estimates that 5,000 women are killed each year for dishonoring their families.2 This may be an underestimate. Aamir Latif, a correspondent for the Islamist website Islam Online who writes frequently on the issue, reported that in 2007 in the Punjab province of Pakistan alone, there were 1,261 honor murders.3 The Aurat Foundation, a Pakistani nongovernmental organization focusing on women's empowerment, found that the rate of honor killings was on track be in the hundreds in 2008. 4 There are very few studies of honor killing, however, as the motivation for such killings is cleansing alleged dishonor and the families do not wish bring further attention their shame, so do not cooperate with researchers. Often, they deny honor crimes completely and say the victim simply went missing or committed suicide. Nevertheless, honor crimes are increasingly visible in the media. Police, politicians, and feminist activists in Europe and in some Muslim countries are beginning treat them as a serious social problem.5 Willingness address the problem of honor killing, however, does not extend many Muslim advocacy groups in North America. The well-publicized denials of U.S. -based advocacy groups are ironic given the debate in the Middle East. While the religious establishment in Jordan, for example, says that honor killing is a relic of pre-Islamic Arab culture, Muslim Brotherhood groups in Jordan have publicly disagreed argue the Islamic religious imperative protect honor. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMiddle East QuarterlySame topicTerrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political ViolenceFrench-language works237,207