MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W131261927

Are Honor Killings Simply Domestic Violence

2009· article· en· W131261927 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Phyllis Chesler

Notice bibliographique

RevueMiddle East Quarterly · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueTerrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHonorWifeDomestic violenceNothingLawIslamCriminologyDenialSociologyPolitical scienceHistoryPoison controlPsychologySuicide preventionMedicinePsychoanalysis
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

On February 12, 2009, Muzzammil Hassan informed police that he had beheaded his wife. Hassan had emigrated the United States 30 years ago and, after a successful banking career, had founded Bridges TV, a Muslim-interest network which aims, according its website, to foster a greater understanding among many cultures and diverse populations. Erie County district attorney Frank A. Sedita III told The Buffalo News that this is the worst form of domestic violence possible, andKhalid Qazi, president of the Muslim Public Affairs Council of Western New York, told the New York Post that Islam forbid such domestic violence. While Muslim advocacy organizations argue that honor killings are a misnomer stigmatizing Muslims for what is simply domestic violence, a problem that has nothing do with religion, Phyllis Chesler, who just completed a study of more than 50 instances of North American honor killings, says the evidence suggests otherwise. - The Editors Published in the Spring 2009 Middle East Quarterly, pp. 61-69. by Phyllis Chesler When a husband murders a wife or daughter in the United States and Canada, too often law enforcement chalks the matter up domestic violence. Murder is murder; religion is irrelevant. Honor killings are, however, distinct from wife battering and child abuse. Analysis of more than fifty reported honor killings shows they differ significantly from more common domestic violence.1 The frequent argument made by Muslim advocacy organizations that honor killings have nothing do with Islam and that it is discriminatory differentiate between honor killings and domestic violence is wrong. Background and Denial Families that kill for honor will threaten girls and women if they refuse cover their hair, their faces, or their bodies or act as their family's domestic servant; wear makeup or Western clothing; choose friends from another religion; date; seek obtain an advanced education; refuse an arranged marriage; seek a divorce from a violent husband; marry against their parents' wishes; or behave in ways that are considered too independent, which might mean anything from driving a car spending time or living away from home or family. Fundamentalists of many religions may expect their women meet some but not all of these expectations. But when women refuse do so, Jews, Christians, and Buddhists are far more likely shun rather than murder them. Muslims, however, do kill for honor, as do, a lesser extent, Hindus and Sikhs. The United Nations Population Fund estimates that 5,000 women are killed each year for dishonoring their families.2 This may be an underestimate. Aamir Latif, a correspondent for the Islamist website Islam Online who writes frequently on the issue, reported that in 2007 in the Punjab province of Pakistan alone, there were 1,261 honor murders.3 The Aurat Foundation, a Pakistani nongovernmental organization focusing on women's empowerment, found that the rate of honor killings was on track be in the hundreds in 2008. 4 There are very few studies of honor killing, however, as the motivation for such killings is cleansing alleged dishonor and the families do not wish bring further attention their shame, so do not cooperate with researchers. Often, they deny honor crimes completely and say the victim simply went missing or committed suicide. Nevertheless, honor crimes are increasingly visible in the media. Police, politicians, and feminist activists in Europe and in some Muslim countries are beginning treat them as a serious social problem.5 Willingness address the problem of honor killing, however, does not extend many Muslim advocacy groups in North America. The well-publicized denials of U.S. -based advocacy groups are ironic given the debate in the Middle East. While the religious establishment in Jordan, for example, says that honor killing is a relic of pre-Islamic Arab culture, Muslim Brotherhood groups in Jordan have publicly disagreed argue the Islamic religious imperative protect honor. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,015
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,049

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,025
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,004
Communication savante0,0030,005
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0150,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,036
Tête enseignante GPT0,297
Écart entre enseignants0,261 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations52
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMiddle East QuarterlyMême sujetTerrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political ViolenceTravaux en français237 207