Humour & National Identity in Canadian Contemporary Art: Diana Thorneycroft, Simon Hughes & BGL
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis explores the use of humour as a means to negotiate themes of identity in some contemporary Canadian art by Diana Thorneycroft, Simon Hughes, and BGL. To ground this exploration of humour as a theme this thesis looks at humour theory and specifies three different discourses of humour which appear to recur frequently within the practices of the artists chosen: incongruity theory, national humour, and irony. As a context for this discussion, the broader topic of contemporary art and humour is addressed. This thesis then looks at the individual artistic practices as case studies. Diana Thorneycroft’s Group of Seven Awkward Moments series is analyzed for its use of Group of Seven paintings as backdrops for incongruous or uncanny scenarios related to Canadian identity. I examine Simon Hughes’ artistic practice from 2002-2007 where Expo 67 and Canadian architecture are the focus, and he makes ironic use of Native imagery. Finally, the section on BGL looks at the way this artists’ collective use irony and incongruity to juxtapose themes of folkloric Quebec life with contemporary consumer culture. All three case studies enable a discussion of how humour can be used to approach the loaded topic of Canadian identity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".