PARA UNA TEORÍA DE LA REALIDAD VIRTUAL EN CALDERÓN
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo se vale del concepto de realidad virtual para analizar la obra de Calderón y enmarcarla en una concepción de la cultura entendida como espectáculo y entretenimiento. En esta concepción, la realidad virtual se entiende a partir de una clasificación que opone lo virtual a lo concreto, no a lo real, y que describe la cultura del Barroco como una época de creativos ensayos sobre la realidad virtual en la literatura y la cultura hispanas que va más allá de la representación y que tiene su origen en problemas históricos relacionados con la expansión del mundo hispánico. Finalmente, se propone la idea de utilizar el concepto de realidad virtual para un proyecto de organización de la producción calderoniana.// The present work makes use the theory of virtual reality in order to analyze and classify the work of Calderón within a concept that defines culture merely as entertainment. This concept regards virtual reality as being in opposition to the concrete, not in opposition to reality. It describes baroque culture as a period of creative experiments on virtual reality within Spanish literature that go beyond a representational function. The origins of this culture are explained by historical problems related to the expansion of the Spanish empire. Finally, it proposes to make use of the concept of virtual reality for a project that organizes the work of Calderón.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it