Bibliographic record
Abstract
The "membrane bilayer" pathway (Rhodes, D. G., J. G. Sarmiento, and L. G. Herbette. 1985. Mol. Pharmacol. 27:612-623.) for 1,4-dihydropyridine calcium channel drug (DHP) binding to receptor sites in cardiac sarcolemmal membranes has been extended to include the interaction of amphiphiles within the lipid bilayer. These studies focused on the ability of the Class III antiarrhythmic agents bretylium and clofilium to nonspecifically inhibit DHP-receptor binding in canine cardiac sarcolemma. Clofilium was found to inhibit nimodipine binding with an inhibition constant of approximately 5 microM, whereas bretylium had no effect on nimodipine binding. Small angle x-ray diffraction was then used to examine the differential ability of these two Class III agents to inhibit DHP-receptor binding. The time-averaged locations of bretylium, clofilium, and nimodipine in bovine cardiac phosphatidylcholine (BCPC) bilayers (supplemented with 13 mol% cholesterol) were determined to a resolution of 9 A. The location of bretylium as dominated by its phenyl ring in BCPC bilayers was found to be at the hydrocarbon core/water interface, similar to that of the dihydropyridine ring of nimodipine. The location of clofilium as dominated by its phenyl ring was found to be below the hydrocarbon/core water interface within the hydrocarbon chain region of the bilayer, similar to that of the phenyl ring of nimodipine. The location of the dihydropyridine ring portion of nimodipine has previously been shown by neutron diffraction to be located at the hydrocarbon core/water interface of native sarcoplasmic reticulum, consistent with the small angle x-ray data from model membranes in this paper. Therefore, we speculate that the nonspecific inhibition arises from the interaction of clofilium's phenyl ring with the site on the calcium channel receptor where the phenyl ring portion of nimodipine must interact. The DHP-receptor binding pathway would then involve both nonspecific (membrane) and specific (protein) binding components, both of which are necessary for receptor binding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".