MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W132085349

From new congregations to the Ancient Church

2003· review· en· W132085349 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A. Orley Swartzentruber

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œMennonite quarterly review · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Farm Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFaithMilitary serviceHistoryGospelChristianityWorshipReligious studiesSociologyEthnologyLawTheologyPolitical scienceArchaeologyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

My parents were Amish-Mennonite farmers from Waterloo County, Ontario. (1) Because my father and mother applied to work in Argentina under the Mennonite Board of Missions without submitting to the necessary validation of ordination by lot, they were excommunicated by the bishop of their congregation. They eventually arrived in Argentina in 1925, beginning a lifetime of in South America and a long series of cross-cultural adaptations of the gospel that were to have an indelible imprint on my journey in the Christian faith. In Tres Lomas--a very rural town of 3000, where I was born--there was no church until my parents planted one. As my family moved, I grew up in other similar churches made up entirely of new converts. uniform dress in the style current among North American Mennonites at the time was not required, partly because poverty would have made it an impossible demand for at least part of the congregation. It would be years before I understood how different this was from American Mennonite ways. Mennonite missionaries in the early days of the Argentine mission vigorously taught nonresistance, even though the concept of conscientious objection to military was completely alien to the Argentine culture of the time. Argentine law in my growing up years required every male citizen to register at age 18 and to serve in the military at age 20. The year of military service was simply a fact of life, an Argentine rite of passage. It was widely credited for producing the high rate of literacy in the nation and was generally regarded as a good thing--the boot camp without the war. You went in a boy and returned a man. A lottery determined who would go into the army for one year (the higher numbers, the majority) or into the navy for two years (the lower numbers, a minority). very lowest numbers were exempted altogether. From the earliest days of the mission in Argentina, I remember hearing members' first-hand accounts of the lottery, as well as earnest prayers being offered for the young men of military age. When, in response to their prayers, these young men drew the very lowest numbers, the congregation rejoiced. From the time of my religious conversion at the age of six, I understood myself to be called to the ministry, and in time this sense of vocation was narrowed down to a specific call to Argentina, following in my father's footsteps. From the spirituality breathed in the air of my home, I absorbed the rock-solid foundation of my own spirituality, which is that when God calls one into Christian service, one ought to obey without rebellion, knowing that the pursuit of that call might ultimately result in martyrdom. When I arrived in Goshen, Indiana in 1945 to begin college and seminary studies, many of the problems discussed there, in class and dormitory, seemed to be, if not frivolous, at least disconnected from as I expected to encounter it again after my return to Argentina. Before coming to America I had known that we were Mennonites, but this label had only the vaguest significance for me, and I thought it, too, was simply an unchangeable fact of life--like the name, indigestible to Latins, Swartzentruben At Goshen College it became clear that I was inexorably expected to think of myself as an American Mennonite, a double challenge. Yet among Mennonites I felt like an alien. sacred sociology of the Mennonite community that I studied under G. F. Hershberger seemed (a) a form of self-congratulation by an ethnic, rural and religious minority group in America and (b) a totally unrealistic cultural freight within the context of my real world in Argentina. forms of common life developed by a persecuted (and deliberately separated) Germanic community over four centuries simply carried no conviction with a congregation of new converts in the third world. Goshen College and Seminary offered me both a liberal education (which I regarded as good) (2) and special training in how to be an American Mennonite (which I regarded as nonessential to the redemption of the world, just as it had been nonessential to the evangelization of Argentina). …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œMennonite quarterly reviewSame topicAgriculture and Farm SafetyFrench-language works237,207