MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W132417028 · doi:10.5962/p.363829

Grizzly Bear, Ursus arctos, usurps Bison, Bison bison, captured by Wolves, Canis lupus, in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming

2001· article· en· W132417028 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Daniel R. MacNulty, Nathan Varley, Douglas W. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Field-Naturalist · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and biodiversity studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrsusCanisBison bisonGrizzly BearsNational parkGeographyGray wolfSystemic lupus erythematosusEcologyZoologyBiologyArchaeologyDemographyPopulationMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe an adult Grizzly Bear (Ursus arctos) usurping a Bison (Bison bison) calf from a pack of five Wolves (Canis lupus) attempting to kill the Bison in Yellowstone National Park during early spring.Five Wolves grabbed the hind end and neck of the calf while it was trailing behind two adult male Bison.In 3 minutes a Grizzly Bear arrived and displaced the two Wolves attacking the hind end.For 1 minute the Grizzly Bear attacked the rear of the Bison while three Wolves attacked the front end.The Grizzly Bear subsequently pulled the struggling calf from the Wolves and made the kill.The Wolves were unable to displace the Grizzly Bear from the carcass.Our observation demonstrates the capacity for Grizzly Bears to exploit the predatory abilities of Gray Wolves restored to Yellowstone National Park.Kleptoparasitism by Grizzly Bears on Wolf-captured ungulates may be a selective pressure promoting group living in Wolves, and could provide an important new food resource to threatened Grizzly Bears in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.312
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Field-NaturalistSame topicEcology and biodiversity studiesFrench-language works237,207