MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W132427715

Aggressive angiomyxoma of the pelvis: a case report.

2007· article· en· W132427715 on OpenAlexaff
Alex Mathieson, Soorna Chandrakanth, George M. Yousef, Patricia Wadden

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrologic and reproductive health conditions
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAggressive angiomyxomaMedicinePerineumPelvisMalignancyFemale pelvisRadiologySurgeryPathology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

First described by Steeper and Rosai in 1983,1 aggressive angiomyxoma (AAM) is a mesenchymal tumour found mainly in the pelvis and perineum. There is a strong female predominance, with a female-to-male ratio of approximately 6:1. It is a slow-growing tumour with a high rate of local recurrence. Because of its rarity, it is often initially misdiagnosed, frequently as a gynecological malignancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0090.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicUrologic and reproductive health conditionsFrench-language works237,207