MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W132697278 · doi:10.1155/2000/409396

Biology of Inflammation in Crohn's Disease: Mechanisms of Action of Anti-TNF-αAlpha Therapy

2000· review· en· W132697278 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Stephan R. Targan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology · 2000
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTumor necrosis factor alphaImmunologyCrohn's diseaseCytokineMonoclonal antibodyPathogenesisMedicineImmune systemInflammationDiseaseIntestinal mucosaAntibodyPathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Several recent trials of intravenously administered antitumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-a) monoclonal antibody have shown dramatic responses among patients with Crohn's disease. These results indicate a primary role for TNF-a in the mediation of altered mucosal immune function in this disease. Clinical responses in patients treated with a single infusion of anti-TNF-a persisted for as long as one year. The prolonged period of clinical benefit shows that the effect of short term TNF-a elimination remains long after the monoclonal antibody has cleared the body. Corresponding in vitro investigation has shown that T helper 1 (Th1) -mediated cytokine production of interferon-gamma is downregulated in the involved mucosa to a level consistent with that seen in uninflamed mucosa. These results suggest that TNF-a-specific augmentation of mucosal Th1 function is the process that is altered by removal of TNF-a and that produces such persistent responses. Understanding how TNF-a modulates mucosal Th1 function may lead to the definition of a key feature of Crohn's disease pathogenesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of GastroenterologySame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207