MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W133325607

Modeling transport networks with design pattern: application to hybrid traffic simulations

2007· article· en· W133325607 on OpenAlex
Walid Chaker, Bernard Moulin, Marius Thériault

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venueinternational conference on Modelling and simulation · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransportation Planning and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCellular automatonComputer scienceRepresentation (politics)GridTransport networkNode (physics)Distributed computingMacroScale (ratio)Theoretical computer scienceArtificial intelligenceEngineeringComputer network
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Being able to vary the level of detail or scale when modeling any system has an increasing interest in different domains. Here we address the issue of multiscale modeling of transport networks in order to enhance feasibility of hybrid simulations, like those who couple macro and micro traffic behaviours, or those who recently tried to combine cellular automata with multi-agent systems in urban simulation and geosimulations. Using an example, we show how a generic link/node representation which forms the core of a design pattern, can be used to instantiate several network models at different scales. Each one can be simulated using the appropriate behavioural model. The design pattern approach avoids drawbacks of strictly hierarchical representations and maintains coherency. We use a multi-level spatial grid to locate vertices that form a link. This hierarchical grid is also a way to deal with behavioural models based on cellular automata. The concept of Place is introduced in order to be able to connect generated synthetic populations to the transport network and, then, to model the travel demand. Multimodality is allowed and opportunities of modal transfers are explicitly defined. The paper also shows how we are using real GIS data of Quebec City to build a three-scale transport network with the suggested approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.772
Threshold uncertainty score0.558

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it