MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W133452084

MUNI METRO GOES POP: IMPLEMENTING PROOF OF PAYMENT FARE COLLECTION ON MUNI METRO

2000· article· en· W133452084 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
D Watry, Peter Straus

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSafety Warnings and Signage
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSignageTransport engineeringPaymentTicketData collectionComputer scienceEngineeringOperations researchTelecommunicationsBusinessComputer securityAdvertisingWorld Wide Web
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The San Francisco Municipal Railway (Muni) is the first light rail system in the United States to convert from traditional fare collection to proof of payment (POP) fare collection. The issues and problems Muni has encountered in making this conversion will be discussed, along with how the problems have been solved, and why Muni made the decisions it did. The lessons learned have applications mainly for traditional systems with extensive street running such as Boston, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, and Toronto, but could also have applications for new systems. At Muni, POP fare collection is being implemented on a system with a mixture of right-of-way (including subway), boarding locations, station and platform configurations, and operating environments, many of which resemble traditional streetcar operation more than they resemble modern light rail. In addition, POP at Muni is initially being implemented largely without the installation of wayside ticket vending machines (TVMs). At Muni, POP is being implemented with onboard fare payment still allowed at many locations, in contrast to other POP systems in the United States. POP fare collection is being phased in at Muni incrementally on a line-by-line basis. This has created special problems for enforcement and passenger information because POP lines run beside lines still using traditional fare collection. The process of conversion involves a large amount of passenger education, which has presented challenges for creating effective and understandable signage and information programs. POP fare collection began at Muni in October 1993, when Muni opened two new surface stations as limited platform-only POP stations, with wayside TVMs. This was Muni's first introduction to POP, although POP was not in effect on board the vehicles operating the line that serves the stations. Muni's transitional E-line was inaugurated in January 1998 as an all-POP line, with fare inspections on board the vehicles for the first time. In August 1998, Muni expanded POP to the N-Judah Line (Muni's heaviest LRV line). POP is being incrementally expanded to all of Muni's lines over the next few years. Enforcement has recently made a transition from the San Francisco Police Department to Muni's new civilian fare inspection force.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.088

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSafety Warnings and SignageFrench-language works237,207