Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este art?culo es un estudio informado por lecturas psicoanal?ticas y kristevianas que explora la junci?n de lo materno en la p?mera novela de Elena Garro, Los recuerdos del porvenir. Aunque Elena Garro es una de varias escritoras que in terrogan el papel de lo materno en sus obras, se distingue de ellas al acercarse a este problema desde la perspectiva de la identificaci?n. Espec?ficamente, Garro confronta a su lector con dos tipos distintos de identificaci?n con la experiencia materna. Por una parte, la novela dramatiza un tipo de identificaci?n fetichista que deviene en una subjetividad melanc?lica identificaci?n que muchas veces se concibe como masculina. Por otra parte, la novela tambi?n describe (y hasta representa) una identificaci?n incestuosa que es catastr?fica para una subjetivi dad que se concibe como femenina. Finalmente, y m?s all? de relatarnos el doble y terrible papel de h identificaci?n materna, la novela sugiere el papel esperan zador que juega el personaje de la sirvienta en este proceso, ya que ella ocupa un espacio mediador que interrumpe ambos tipos de identificaci?n.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".