MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W135421370

Harold Klunder : The Lethbridge Paintings

2000· book· en· W135421370 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
James D. Campbell

Bibliographic record

VenueSouthern Alberta Art Gallery eBooks · 2000
Typebook
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicJungian Analytical Psychology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlchemyPaintingExhibitionUnconscious mindArtInterpretation (philosophy)Art historyVisual artsLiteraturePhilosophyLinguisticsEpistemology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This catalogue, published to accompany Klunder’s exhibition “The Lethbridge Paintings” (2000), contains an essay by Campbell that focuses on the role of alchemy within the artist’s practice. The author’s phenomenological interpretation of Klunder’s abstract art foregrounds relationships between surface and depth, imagination and corporeality, body-image and the unconscious. Numerous references are made to C.G. Jung’s texts on “prima materia” and J. Elkins’ book “What Painting Is.” List of works; biographical notes. 31 bibl. ref.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.223
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0690.292

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSouthern Alberta Art Gallery eBooksSame topicJungian Analytical PsychologyFrench-language works237,207