Prevalence and Associated Factors to Human Papillomaviruses Types 16 and 18 among Malagasy Women in Fianarantsoa, Madagascar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, we analyzed by means of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) cerv ical specimens obtained from consenting women in Fianarantsoa, 1712 cerv ical specimens obtained fro m them. The data obtained were co mp iled to establish correlation and prevalence of HPV. Different PCR techniques were used to detect HPV in fection. Consensus primer sets MY and GP, and specific primers for HPV 16 and 18 were utilized to obtain the HPV typing. The result showed that 43 specimensare positive by M Y and GP that 22(51.16%) are HPV 16 and 15(34.88%) HPV18. 67.56% of the infected are about 45 year old; 48.65% d ivorced; each woman had at least 2 d ifferent partners before marry ing and mo re of 4 partners after divorce. 29.73% of them are married and everyone had at least 4 partners before marrying. 21.62% are un married, with mu ltip le partners. Our results indicated that HPV infections, especially those HPV 16 and 18 represent a significant public health in Madagascar. Keyswords Consensus Primers, Fianarantsoa, Human Pap illo mavirus (HPV), Madagascar, Poly merase Chain Reaction (PCR)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".