MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W13616433

L’oral au service de… l’oral : se familiariser avec ses spécificités

2004· article· fr· W13616433 on OpenAlexaff
Viateur Paradis

Bibliographic record

VenueQuébec français/Québec-français · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Language Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CAHIER PRATIQUE mSe familiariser avec ses spécificités PAR VIATEUR PARADIS* L'essentiel de la distinction oral/écrit réside dans le fait que ces deux modes ou modalités d'expression possèdent un fonctionnement qui leur est propre.Une meilleure compréhension de ce fonctionnement et sa prise en considération par l'enseignant et l'élève sont nécessaires au développement des compétences en communication orale informelle et formelle.Le présent cahier pratique entend contribuer à assurer une meilleure compréhension du fonctionnement de l'oral en tant que modalité d'expression.Ce cahier pratique s'adresse aux enseignants du primaire et du secondaire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score0.195

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.008
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0470.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuébec français/Québec-françaisSame topicFrench Language Learning MethodsFrench-language works237,207