La promoción de la salud y los actores del ámbito regional-local: enseñanzas de un coloquio
Bibliographic record
Abstract
integracion de la prevencion y de la promocion en los sistemas de salud”. A pesar de la diversidad de los cuatro sistemas de salud presentados, pudieron detectarse varias similitudes respecto de las dificultades y de las experiencias, lo que permitio presentar tres perspectivas de accion. Asi, se sugiere que podria ser posible una mejor integracion de la promocion y de la prevencion en los sistemas de salud en virtud de una mayor movilizacion de la poblacion y de los actores del ambito de la salud en favor de la prevencion, pero con la condicion de que el sector de la promocion y de la prevencion aseguren su credibilidad mediante el desarrollo de la calidad de sus practicas y de su organizacion y que el discurso y las practicas de prevencion se ajusten al contexto de la atencion. Por ultimo, la busqueda de intercambios Resumenes
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".