MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W136768507

Flow susceptibility of heterogeneous marly formations. Implications for torrent hazard control in the Barcelonnette basin (Alpes-de-Haute-Provence, France)

2003· preprint· en· W136768507 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐Philippe Malet, Alexandre Remaître, Olivier Maquaire, Christophe Ancey, Jacques Locat

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2003
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandslides and related hazards
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyDebris flowRheometryRheologyDebrisFlow (mathematics)Geotechnical engineeringSlumpingShear (geology)LandslideGeomorphologyPetrologyMechanicsMaterials science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Earthflows, debris avalanches and debris flows occurring in black marls in Southeast France present differentiated morphological characteristics and velocities. The rheological response of these remoulded fine-grained flow-like landslide deposits have been investigated using several techniques (parallel-plate rheometry, coaxial rheometry, slump tests and inclined plane tests). This contribution shows that rheological characteristics can be useful in establishing the transformation process of the materials into flow-like phenomena and identifying the natural mixture of basic formations which present the weakest yield stress and viscosity. Results show that the simple shear behaviour of all these natural flows clearly distinguishes the type of movement, in particular for earthflow and debris flow. Furthermore, some proportion mixtures present the highest mobility properties, and thus the highest susceptibility for transformation into high-speed flow-like phenomena. Results may be useful for identifying potential source zones in muddy flow-like landslide prone areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.371
Threshold uncertainty score0.972

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Same topicLandslides and related hazardsFrench-language works237,207