The effect of lithium on the adrenoceptor-mediated second messenger system in the rat brain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Lithium remains the most widely used treatment for bipolar disorder; however, the molecular mechanisms underlying its therapeutic actions have not been fully elucidated. We studied the in-vivo effect of lithium on the density of alpha-adrenoceptor (alpha-AR) and beta-AR subtypes and linked second messenger systems in the rat brain. METHODS: The densities of alpha(1)-ARs, alpha(2)-ARs, and beta(1)-ARs and beta(2)-ARs in the cortex and cerebellum of rats treated with lithium (0.4%), orally, for 30 days were measured using [(3)H]prazosin, [(3)H]clonidine and [(3)H]CGP-12177, respectively. The activity of adenylyl cyclase (AC) and levels of inositol trisphosphate (IP3), both second messengers linked to these receptors, were estimated using [(3)H]ATP and [(3)H]myoinositol, respectively. RESULTS: A significant decrease in the densities of cortical alpha(1)-ARs (85%, p < 0.0001), alpha(2)-ARs (50%, p < 0.0001), beta(1)-ARs (26%, p < 0.0001) and beta(2)-ARs (25%, p < 0.0001) was observed after lithium treatment. However, only the density of alpha(1)-ARs was significantly decreased (25%, p < 0.0001) in the cerebellum. The affinity of [(3)H]prazosin for cerebellar alpha(1)-ARs was increased. A small, but statistically significant, increase (19%, p < 0.0001) in the density of total beta-ARs was seen in the cerebellum, without altering the affinity of the radioligand for these receptors. Basal AC activity was not altered in the lithium-treated rat cortex. However, the norepinephrine-stimulated AC activity, which represents alpha(2)-AR-linked and beta-AR-linked AC, was significantly increased (66%, p < 0.0001). Both basal IP3 formation and norepinephrine-stimulated IP3, which represents alpha(1)-AR-linked phospholipase C activity, were significantly decreased (50%, p < 0.0001) in the lithium-treated rat cortex. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that long-term administration of lithium treatment downregulates the cortical, but not cerebellar, alpha(1)-ARs, alpha(2)-ARs, beta(1)-ARs and beta(2)-ARs. Thus, it may be concluded that lithium induces region-specific and differential functional downregulation of alpha-AR and beta-AR subtypes in the rat brain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".