MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Endurance training attenuates loss of bone strength in the polymerase gamma mutator mouse model of aging

2010· article· en· W136930364 on OpenAlex
AnaMaria Antolic, Adeel Safdar, Jacqueline M. Bourgeois, Bart P. Hettinga, Gregory R. Wohl, Gregory C. Kujoth, Tomas A. Prolla, Mark A. Tarnopolsky

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics and Physical Performance
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsEndurance trainingMedicineBone mineralOsteoporosisFemursedInternal medicineKyphosisEndocrinologyBiologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A causal role for mtDNA mutagenesis in aging‐associated bone loss is supported by recent studies demonstrating that the polymerase gamma (PolG) mutator mouse, harbouring a proofreading‐deficient copy of PolG, exhibits a significant reduction in whole‐body bone mineral content and density. Physiological aging is accompanied by kyphosis, osteoporosis and an increased incidence of fractures. Anecdotal evidence from human and rodent studies suggests that endurance training prevents loss of bone mineral density, mobility and posture, and is recommended to reduce the likelihood of falling and associated morbidity and mortality. We investigated whether endurance training can prevent bone strength decrements in PolG mice. At 3 months of age, 24 PolG mice (♀ = ♂) were randomly assigned to a sedentary (SED) or forced‐endurance training (END; 15m/min for 45 min, 3x/week for 5 months) group. PolG‐SED mice exhibited a marked decrease in maximal load (33%), maximal energy (39%) and stress (33%) vs. wild‐type (WT) controls (P<0.01) with a trend toward decreased stiffness (19%) in the femur (P<0.07) and bone area (9%) at the mid‐diaphysis (P<0.08). PolG‐END showed an improvement in all structural parameters (P<0.01) returning to WT levels. We found no differences in femur length, periosteal and endosteal area at the mid‐diaphysis. Five months of endurance training rescued the loss of femur strength in PolG mice. (Funded by CIHR)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.206

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it