MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W137006608

A system design for content-based image retrieval and analysis of mammograms using PostgreSQL with image-handling extension

2007· article· en· W137006608 on OpenAlexaff
Denise Guliato, Ernani Viriato de Melo, Robson Carvalho Soares, Rangaraj M. Rangayyan

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Biomedical Engineering · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSQLFeature (linguistics)Query by ExampleData miningExtension (predicate logic)Graphical user interfaceSet (abstract data type)Image retrievalContent-based image retrievalFeature extractionInformation retrievalDatabaseImage (mathematics)Artificial intelligenceSearch engineProgramming languageWeb search query
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the design of a system for content-based image retrieval applied to mammograms. The system takes into account the imprecision presents in the search, and makes available user-defined methods to create new image descriptors as well as user-defined feature vectors formed by combinations of previously defined descriptors using a graphical interface. The system was projected and developed using the eXtension Relational DataBase Management System (XRDBMS) PostgreSQL with Image-Handling Extension (PostgreSQL-IE) that supports content-based image retrieval. PostgreSQL-IE is independent of application, and offers the advantage of being open-source and portable. The extended data manipulation and definition language for manipulating image data in the proposed extension is called SQL-IE. The language has a syntax similar to that of SQL (Structured Query Language), and is composed of a set of functions that includes commands to create new feature extraction procedures, new feature vectors as a combination of previously defined features; and new access methods. SQL-IE also includes resources for defining queries by combining conventional and visual data. PostgreSQL-IE makes a new image data type available that permits associating several images with one unique attribute. This resource makes possible the combination of visual features of different images in the same feature vector.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.816
Threshold uncertainty score0.464

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Conference on Biomedical EngineeringSame topicImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesFrench-language works237,207