TOWARD AN IMPROVED ORTHOMETRIC HEIGHT SYSTEM FOR CANADA
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au Canada, les hauteurs sont definies dans le systeme des hauteurs orthometriques selon une methode proposee par Helmert en 1890. Toutefois, beaucoup de travail theorique sur les hauteurs a ete accompli depuis, conduisant a une definition plus rigoureuse des hauteurs orthometriques. La nouvelle definition tient compte des effets de la rugosite du terrain, de la densite topographique anomale variable lateralement et de la perturbation de la gravite du geoide de la TN, qui ne sont pas consideres dans la methode de Helmert. Cet article presente un calcul des corrections des hauteurs orthometriques de Helmert, les mettant a jour selon la definition plus rigoureuse. Les corrections pour chaque effet, ainsi que la correction totale comprenant les trois effets, sont evaluees pour une zone d'essai au Canada qui comprend plusieurs types de terrains. La correction peut atteindre quelques decimetres dans certaines zones montagneuses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it