MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W13833559 · doi:10.4000/lisa.6340

Intertextualité et forme dans le roman caribéen-canadien : de l’écriture dystopique de Neil Bissoondath au roman polysystémique de Ramabai Espinet

2022· article· fr· W13833559 on OpenAlex
Rodolphe Solbiac

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue LISA / LISA e-journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette étude examine les formes de l’intertextualité existant entre The Swinging Bridge de Ramabai Espinet et deux romans dystopiques, A Casual Brutality et The Worlds Within Her, écrits par Neil Bissoondath. Une analyse comparative démontre que l’écriture de The Swinging Bridge consiste en une refonctionnalisation du matériau littéraire utilisé par Bissoondath pour l’élaboration de ses romans. The Swinging Bridge est à la fois une antithèse du discours véhiculé par A Casual Brutality sur le conflit culturel trinidadien et une réécriture plus systématique de The Worlds Within Her qui produit une vision alternative de la récupération de la mémoire indo-trinidadienne. Elle établit, ensuite, que The Swinging Bridge constitue un polysystème littéraire dont la réécriture du malaise identitaire du sujet indo-caribéen-canadien présente l’hybridité culturelle ainsi que les appartenances diasporiques et transnationales comme des alternatives au conflit culturel si exacerbé dans l’œuvre de Bissoondath.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.732
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it