MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W13833559 · doi:10.4000/lisa.6340

Intertextualité et forme dans le roman caribéen-canadien : de l’écriture dystopique de Neil Bissoondath au roman polysystémique de Ramabai Espinet

2022· article· fr· W13833559 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rodolphe Solbiac

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue LISA / LISA e-journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette étude examine les formes de l’intertextualité existant entre The Swinging Bridge de Ramabai Espinet et deux romans dystopiques, A Casual Brutality et The Worlds Within Her, écrits par Neil Bissoondath. Une analyse comparative démontre que l’écriture de The Swinging Bridge consiste en une refonctionnalisation du matériau littéraire utilisé par Bissoondath pour l’élaboration de ses romans. The Swinging Bridge est à la fois une antithèse du discours véhiculé par A Casual Brutality sur le conflit culturel trinidadien et une réécriture plus systématique de The Worlds Within Her qui produit une vision alternative de la récupération de la mémoire indo-trinidadienne. Elle établit, ensuite, que The Swinging Bridge constitue un polysystème littéraire dont la réécriture du malaise identitaire du sujet indo-caribéen-canadien présente l’hybridité culturelle ainsi que les appartenances diasporiques et transnationales comme des alternatives au conflit culturel si exacerbé dans l’œuvre de Bissoondath.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.817
Threshold uncertainty score0.364

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0090.026
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue LISA / LISA e-journalSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207