Fifteen years of clinical and echocardiographic follow up with the carbomedics heart valve.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Mechanical prostheses are used in young patients, the CarboMedics valve having been the mechanical valve of choice of the present authors during the past 15 years. The study aim was to analyze long-term clinical and echocardiographic results obtained with CarboMedics mechanical valves. METHODS: A total of 2,953 patients underwent valve replacement with the CarboMedics valve between 1988 and 2004 at the Montreal Heart Institute. Patients were prospectively followed at the outpatient valve clinic. Subsequently, 1,004 patients underwent echocardiographic examinations during follow up. RESULTS: In total, 1,597 patients (mean age 57 +/- 12 years) underwent isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR), 1,043 patients (mean age 59 +/- 10 years) underwent isolated mitral valve replacement (MVR), and 313 patients (mean age 58 +/- 11 years) underwent AVR+MVR. The mean five-, 10- and 15-year actuarial survival rates were 83 +/- 1%, 70 +/- 2% and 62 +/- 3% in AVR patients, 76 +/- 1%, 59 +/- 2% and 40 +/- 14% in MVR patients, and 68 +/- 3%, 51 +/- 4% and 33 +/- 9% in AVR+MVR patients. The mean 15-year freedom from cerebral embolism, hemorrhage and reoperation was 95 +/- 1%, 97 +/- 1% and 95 +/- 1% in AVR patients, 92 +/- 1%, 97 +/- 1% and 93 +/- 1% in MVR patients, and 94 +/- 2%, 93 +/- 2% and 91 +/- 4% in AVR+MVR patients. AVR patients had a mean aortic gradient of 29 +/- 14, 20 +/- 8, 18 +/- 7, 16 +/- 7, 12 +/- 5 and 11 +/- 5 mmHg with 19, 21, 23, 25, 27 and 29 mm prostheses, respectively (p = 0.001). MVR patients had a mean mitral gradient of 5.3 +/- 3, 4.9 +/- 2.2, 4.6 +/- 2, 4.4 +/- 2.9 and 4.9 +/- 1.8 mmHg with 25, 27, 29, 31 and 33 mm prostheses, respectively (p = 0.63). CONCLUSION: Patient survival and valve-related complications were satisfactory at 15 years after valve replacement with the CarboMedics valve. Mean aortic gradients were high with the 19-mm aortic prostheses, but all other valve sizes showed good hemodynamic performance, as measured using transthoracic echocardiography.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".