El régimen lingüístico de la provincia canadiense de Neuvo Brunswick
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En Canada rige un modelo de federalismo linguistico. Este modelo se caracteriza, entre otras notas, por una estrecha vinculacion entre regimen linguistico y estructura federal del Estado. Las lenguas mayoritarias tienen consideracion de idiomas estatales y, al mismo tiempo, cada entidad federada puede configurar su propia politica linguistica. Este articulo analiza el regimen linguistico de una provincia canadiense que goza de un estatuto un tanto particular: Nuevo Brunswick. Es la unica provincia que garantiza un regimen de cooficialidad linguistica en el que ambos idiomas oficiales, frances e ingles, gozan de las mismas garantias constitucionales. Dichas garantias se fundamentan sobre el principio constitucional de igualdad de los dos idiomas oficiales y el principio de igualdad de ambas comunidades linguisticas. Se trata de un marco normativo unico en el escenario provincial canadiense que constituye el resultado de una larga evolucion historica, condicionada por multiples factores sociales y politicos, tanto puntuales como continuos
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".