Whose story is this anyway? : an excerpt from the novel manuscript Never going back and the critical paper "whose story is this anyway? : exploring point of view in the novel"
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The thesis is made up of the creative project and a critical paper. The creativenproject is the opening section of the manuscript, Never Going Back, ancontemporary novel which rotates through the minds of three friends. In thensummer of 1999, the friends reunite in Nelson BC, Canada for the birth of a child.nThe occasion forces them to explore a tragedy in their past and its implications forntheir present and future lives. n The critical is an exploration of point of view in the novel through annexamination of my own writing process as well as techniques used in twonpublished novels, Music and Silence by Rose Tremain and Saints of Big Harbour bynLynn Coady. My particular emphasis is on how writers successfully employnmultiple points of view and variable focalization.n
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it