MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W139889293 · doi:10.5206/cie-eci.v34i1.9053

Citizenship Education for Child Citizens

2005· article· en· W139889293 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueComparative and International Education · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChildren's Rights and Participation
Canadian institutionsCape Breton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitizenshipConventionMeaning (existential)Political scienceHumanitiesSociologyLawPhilosophyEpistemologyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One important reason for the inadequacy of current citizenship education is that children – defined here as all young persons under age 18 - are rarely seen and treated as citizens in their own right. To the extent that children are educated about citizenship, they typically learn about their rights and responsibilities as future adult citizens. They rarely learn that they are citizens of the present and they are rarely treated as such. This article reviews the modern meaning of citizenship and shows, in reference to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, that children indeed are citizens of the present. It shows that when the ingredients of the modern understanding of citizenship are applied to children – rights, responsibilities, participation, and differentiated citizenship – children need to be recognized as citizens. Such an understanding, it is contended, is a necessary foundation for successful citizenship education. Une cause importante du caractère inadéquat de l’éducation à la citoyenneté actuelle est que les enfants – définis ici comme toutes les personnes de moins de 18 ans – sont rarement vus et traités comme des citoyens à part entière. Dans la mesure où les enfants sont éduqués à propos de la citoyenneté, ils apprennent habituellement des notions sur leurs droits et responsabilités qu’ils auront une fois adultes. Ils apprennent rarement qu’ils sont déjà eux-mêmes des citoyens et qu’ils devraient être traités comme tels. Cet article analyse la signification moderne de la citoyenneté et montre, en se basant sur la Convention des Droits de l’enfant des Nations-Unies, que les enfants sont effectivement des citoyens dans le présent. Ainsi, lorsque les ingrédients de la compréhension moderne de la citoyenneté sont appliqués aux enfants – droits, responsabilités, participation et citoyenneté différenciée –, les enfants doivent être reconnus comme citoyens. L’auteur soutient qu’une telle compréhension est un fondement nécessaire pour la réussite de l’éducation à la citoyenneté.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score0.351

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.440
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it