MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W140188979 · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1630

The Prognostic Value of Pre-Operative and Post-Operative B-Type Natriuretic Peptides in Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery

2013· review· en· W140188979 on OpenAlexafffund
Reitze Rodseth, Bruce Biccard, Yannick Le Manach, Daniel I. Sessler, Lehana Thabane, Robert C. Schutt, Daniel Bolliger, Lucio Cagini, Daniela Cardinale, Carol Chong, Rong Chu, Miłosław Cnotliwy, Salvatore Di Somma, René Fahrner, Wen Kwang Lim, Elisabeth Mahla, Ramaswamy Manikandan, Francesco Puma, Wook Bum Pyun, Milan Radović, Sriram Rajagopalan, Stuart Suttie, Thuva Vanniyasingam, William J. van Gaal, Marek Waliszek, P.J. Devereaux

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American College of Cardiology · 2013
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsSt. Joseph’s Healthcare HamiltonHamilton Health SciencesMcMaster UniversityPopulation Health Research Institute
FundersErasmus Universitair Medisch Centrum RotterdamNational Health and Medical Research CouncilRoche DiagnosticsCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNovo Nordisk PharmaCSL BehringInyuvesi Yakwazulu-NataliMedical Research CouncilNovo NordiskMcMaster UniversityHeart and Stroke Foundation of CanadaUniversity of MelbourneSouth African Society of Anaesthesiologists
KeywordsMedicineConfidence intervalOdds ratioPerioperativeNatriuretic peptideInternal medicineMyocardial infarctionCardiologySurgeryHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations346
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American College of CardiologySame topicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesFrench-language works237,207