MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W140587244 · doi:10.1021/pr2004055

Quantitative iTRAQ Analysis of Retinal Ganglion Cell Degeneration after Optic Nerve Crush

2011· article· en· W140587244 on OpenAlexafffund
Mark Magharious, Philippe M. D’Onofrio, Adam C. Hollander

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Proteome Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsRetinal ganglion cellOptic nerveGanglionDegeneration (medical)Retinal degenerationRetinalOphthalmologyAnatomyChemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) are central nervous system (CNS) neurons that transmit visual information from the retina to the brain. Apoptotic RGC degeneration causes visual impairment that can be modeled by optic nerve crush. Neuronal apoptosis is also a salient feature of CNS trauma, ischemia (stroke), and diseases of the CNS such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, multiple sclerosis, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Optic nerve crush induces the apoptotic cell death of ∼ 70% of RGCs within the first 14 days after injury. This model is particularly attractive for studying adult neuron apoptosis because the time-course of RGC death is well established and axon regeneration within the myelinated optic nerve can be concurrently evaluated. Here, we performed a large scale iTRAQ proteomic study to identify and quantify proteins of the rat retina at 1, 3, 4, 7, 14, and 21 days after optic nerve crush. In total, 337 proteins were identified, and 110 were differentially regulated after injury. Of these, 58 proteins were upregulated (>1.3 ×), 46 were downregulated (<0.7 ×), and 6 showed both positive and negative regulation over 21 days, relative to normal retinas. Among the differentially expressed proteins, Thymosin-β4 showed an early upregulation at 3 days, the time-point that immediately precedes the induction of RGC apoptosis after injury. We examined the effect of exogenous Thymosin-β4 administration on RGC death after optic nerve injury. Intraocular injections of Thymosin-β4 significantly increased RGC survival by ∼ 3-fold compared to controls and enhanced axon regeneration after crush, demonstrating therapeutic potential for CNS insults. Overall, our study identified numerous proteins that are differentially regulated at key time-points after optic nerve crush, and how the temporal profiles of their expression parallel RGC death. This data will aid in the future development of novel therapeutics to promote neuronal survival and regeneration in the adult CNS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Proteome ResearchSame topicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207