Effects of soil type and exogenous application of yeast extract on soybean seed isoflavone concentration.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Field experiments were established in 2004 at two soil types of the Emile A. Lods Agronomy Research Centre in SainteAnne-de-Bellevue, QC, Canada [Soil types were a fine sandy loam at one site (site A) & a Macdonald clay loam at the other (site B)] to determine the effect of foliar application of yeast extract on the isoflavones content of soybean seeds. Yeast extracts were applied at two stages of development [early podding (R3) & mid podding (R4)]. A non-treated control was also included. Total and individual isoflavone concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Results indicated that total isoflavone concentration did not differ significantly due to site effects. On the other hand, the greatest individul and total isoflavone concentrations were observed following the foliar application of yeast extract 2 mg mL at R4 stage. © 2011 Eriends Science Publishers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".