MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1408812646 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2013-0031

Low pressure line shape study of nitrogen-perturbed acetylene transitions in the ν<sub>1</sub> + ν<sub>3</sub> band over a range of temperatures

2013· article· en· W1408812646 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Chad Povey, Mileno Guillorel-Obregon, Adriana Predoi−Cross, S. V. Ivanov, O. G. Buzykin, Franck Thibault

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcetylenePhysicsAtomic physicsLine (geometry)NitrogenSpectral lineRange (aeronautics)Ab initioArgonAbsorption (acoustics)DiffusionAtmospheric temperature rangeTorrAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceOpticsThermodynamicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Six nitrogen-perturbed transitions of acetylene within the ν 1 + ν 3 absorption band have been recorded using a three-channel diode laser spectrometer. The goal being an improved understanding of both broadening and narrowing effects of low-pressure acetylene under the influence of nitrogen gas. To this end we have examined C 2 H 2 spectra using a hard collision Rautian profile over a range of five temperatures (213–333 K) and five pressures (5–40 Torr). From these fits we have obtained the N 2 -broadening and narrowing coefficients of C 2 H 2 and examined their temperature dependence. The experimentally measured narrowing coefficients have been used to estimate the nitrogen diffusion coefficients (D 12 ) and are presented within. The broadening coefficients and corresponding temperature dependence exponents have also been compared to that of calculations completed using a classical impact approach on an ab initio potential energy surface. We have observed good agreement between our theoretical and experimental results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.681

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207