MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1410441101

기능적 활동의 수행에 대한 상상연습이 뇌졸중 환자의 편측무시와 일상생활활동에 미치는 효과

2009· article· ko· W1410441101 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
최유임

Bibliographic record

Venue한국산학기술학회논문지 · 2009
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Safety, and Science Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraySubject (documents)Measure (data warehouse)Task (project management)Computer scienceEngineeringWorld Wide WebMechanical engineeringData mining
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

본 연구는 손상된 사지의 기능적 활동 수행에 대한 상상연습이 뇌졸중 환자의 편측무시와 일상생활활동에 미치는 효과를 알아보는 것이었다. 연구는 개별실험연구방법(single-subject experimental research design) 중 ABA 설계 를 사용하였다. 실험은 총 18회로 구성하였으며, 기초선 과정이 5회, 상상연습을 시행한 중재 과정이 10회, 기초선 회 귀 과정은 중재 과정을 마친 2주 뒤에 3회를 측정하였다. 상상연습은 3개의 기능적인 활동(옷 입기, 화장품을 사용하 여 화장한 뒤 정리하기, 옷을 개기)을 수행하는 것으로, 각 활동에 대해서 5분씩, 1일 총 15분을 상상하도록 하였다. 편측무시는 읽기 검사, 쓰기 검사, Baking Tray Task를 사용하여 측정하였고, 일상생활활동은 COPM(Canada Occupational Performance Measure)으로 평가하였다. 연구 결과 상상연습 후 편측무시 검사의 점수가 모두 감소되었고, 일상생활활동에 대한 검사 점수도 임상적으로 유의한 효과가 있는 것으로 나타나, 상상연습이 뇌졸중 환자의 편측무 시를 감소시키고, 일상생활활동을 증진시키는 것으로 나타났다.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.597
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue한국산학기술학회논문지Same topicEducation, Safety, and Science StudiesFrench-language works237,207