Bibliographic record
Abstract
Composés sous les doubles signes de l’amour et de la mort, de l’anamorphose et de l’aporie, Les Essais de Michel de Montaigne et Les Ambassadeurs de Hans Holbein sont des monuments renaissants à l’amitié. Montaigne voue son texte protéen au souvenir d’Etienne de La Boétie, l’ami absent autour duquel se construisent les « grotesques » de ses essais, tandis que Holbein mémorialise la rencontre des ambassadeurs et amis Jean de Dinteville (bailli de Troyes) et George de Selve (évêque de Lavaur) en Angleterre en 1533, autour du fameux memento mori anamorphotique du crâne au premier plan. Si le tableau et le texte figurent le double postulat de la vie et de la mort, de l’absence et de la présence, du passage du temps et de valeurs sempiternelles, ils partagent aussi une esthétique du retour, du détournement, propre à la perspective curieuse ou oblique, qui ne cesse de remettre en cause l’univocité du signe. Il s’agit donc, dans cet article, d’interroger les convergences et divergences de procédés et de points de vue impliquant la participation de l’ami lecteur, qui est interpellé par les signes troubles de ces oeuvres mouvantes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".