MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1418321434 · doi:10.7567/jjap.54.086502

Relationship between information and energy carried by photons in extreme ultraviolet lithography: Consideration from the viewpoint of sensitivity enhancement

2015· article· en· W1418321434 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJapanese Journal of Applied Physics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Photolithography Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsResistLithographyPhotonLimitingExtreme ultravioletExtreme ultraviolet lithographyUltravioletSensitivity (control systems)OpticsEnergy (signal processing)Materials scienceNanotechnologyOptoelectronicsPhysicsElectronic engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The role of photons in lithography is to transfer information and energy for imaging. The resist patterns are fabricated in accordance with the information carried by the photons. The energy is used to induce the chemical reactions required for changing the solubility of the resist. In this study, the relationship between the information and the energy carried by photons in extreme ultraviolet lithography was investigated from the viewpoint of sensitivity enhancement. The factor limiting the resist performance (information or energy) depended on the relationship between the resist requirement and the potential performance. The determination of the limiting factor is essential in designing highly sensitive resist materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score0.419

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it