MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1418342159 · doi:10.1159/000381045

Osteoporosis in Children with Chronic Disease

2015· review· en· W1418342159 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEndocrine development · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and osteoporosis research
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoporosisMedicineDeformityBone densityBone mineralBone healthDiseasePhysical therapyMetabolic bone diseasePediatricsSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Serious illness in children and its therapy can cause osteoporosis, manifesting as vertebral and nonvertebral fractures, pain, skeletal deformity and temporary or even permanent loss of ambulation. In contrast to adults, skeletal growth in children offers tremendous potential to recover bone mineral density and to reshape fractured vertebral bodies, even without bone-targeted therapy, provided that bone health threats are transient and residual growth is sufficient. Here, we outline the principles of bone strength development and the risk factors for osteoporosis due to various paediatric systemic illnesses. We also explain why the approach to the diagnosis and monitoring of childhood osteoporosis has moved away from a bone density-centric focus to a more functional assessment. Finally, we discuss the best candidates for and current approaches to the treatment of osteoporosis in children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it