Synergism of organic silicone adjuvant on control of sclerotinia disease in oilseed rape by Prochloraz.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The water-tolerance of Prochloraz and the influence of organic silicone adjuvant on the control of sclerotinia disease in oilseed rape(Brassica napus) by Prochloraz were measured by using a watering can to form simulated rainfall in the field of oilseed rape.The results showed that the control effect of Prochloraz against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum was significantly reduced by the simulated rainfall(water spray).However,the addition of organic silicone could effectively prevent this reduction in the control effect of Prochloraz,enhance the water-tolerance of Prochloraz,and also prolong the period of validity of Prochloraz against S.sclerotiorum from 12 days to 14 days.Field tests were conducted on oilseed rape cultivars Zhongshuang No.9 and Zhongshuang No.10,and the average control effect of Prochloraz and Prochloraz plus organic silicone against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum was 74.0% and80.0% respectively,suggesting that the addition of organic silicone had a certain synergism on the control of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in both cultivars by Prochloraz.Furthermore,the plant height,effective pod number per plant,seed number per pod and 1000-seed weight were not significantly different among the treatments of Prochloraz,organic silicone,Prochloraz added with organic silicone,and water,indicating that Procholraz and organic silicone had no inhibition to the growth and development of oilseed rape.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".