MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W142145879

Impact Craters as Habitats for Life: Endolithic Colonization of Shocked Gneiss from the Haughton Impact Structure, Devon Island, Canada

2013· article· en· W142145879 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A. Pontefract

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship@Western (Western University) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImpact craterImpact structureColonizationGneissGeologyHabitatShock metamorphismGeographyArchaeologyEcologyPaleontologyAstrobiologyBiologyMetamorphic rock
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Meteorite impacts are ubiquitous throughout our solar system and are a fundamental geological process on rocky and icy planetary bodies. Though initially detrimental to biology, an impact event can favourably change the availability and habitability of a substrate for endolithic organisms, which are then able to (re)colonize micro-fractures and pore spaces created during the impact. The colonization of rocks by endolithic communities is an advantageous trait, especially in environments such as hot or cold deserts, where temperature shifts, low water availability and high UV indices pose a significant problem. On Mars, similar conditions – albeit, more extreme – prevail. In these instances, impact structures could provide refuge to endolithic organisms. Previous work has shown the increase of microbial biomass with shock level in sedimentary rocks, related to increases in porosity. However, sedimentary rocks experience a collapse of pore spaces at pressures over ~35 GPa and, thus, do not support endolithic colonization at pressures higher than this. In contrast, the porosity of crystalline rocks such as gneisses increases proportionally until vapourization. This study considers shocked gneisses from the 39 Ma, 23 km diameter Haughton impact structure, Devon Island, Canada, and investigates the relationship between shock metamorphism and microbial colonization. Utilizing a variety of microscopy techniques, the subsurface community was visualized and the biomass levels calculated with increasing shock metamorphism. Average cell abundance was found to increase with shock level, with a maximum of 108 cells/g. It was found that microbial biomass did increase with increasing porosity, and was not affected by reductions in trace element concentrations of the rock, likely being more dependent on exogenous nutrients within meteoric waters or supplied aerially. It can be concluded that crystalline substrates can become habitats for endolithic organisms through the process of impact metamorphism, providing an excellent refuge in extreme environments. On Mars where the substrate is largely basaltic, it is suggested that impact craters would be an excellent target for life detection due to extensive deposits of shocked basalt. These more mafic rocks, coupled with the presence of hydrothermal activity, would have potentially provided significant colonization potential on early Mars and may continue to provide refuge today.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship@Western (Western University)→Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→