MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W142844336 · doi:10.7202/032635ar

Aspects of the Postglacial Climate of Alberta: Calibration of the Pollen Record

2007· article· en· W142844336 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Robert E. Vance

Bibliographic record

VenueGéographie physique et Quaternaire · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPollenHolocenePalynologyGrasslandGeologyPhysical geographyVegetation (pathology)Climate changePrecipitationPollen sourceLast Glacial MaximumHolocene climatic optimumClimatologyGeographyEcologyPaleontologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This reconstruction of the postglacial climate of Alberta is based on a review of pollen studies within the province and the application of calibration equations to a pollen record from central Alberta. Regional palynological studies indicate that the late glacial vegetation, dominated by non-arboreal taxa and, on occasion, Populus, was replaced by a Picea dominated assemblage between 12,000 and 10,000 BP. In central Alberta, increased herbaceous pollen representation suggests that grassland was established north of its current position in early to middle Holocene time. By 3500 BP, the grassland boundary had retreated southward. Little vegetational change is evident during the last 3500 years. Calibration equations, derived from modern pollen and climatic data in the western interior of Canada and applied to an 11,400 year pollen record, suggest growing season temperature was 1.5°C greater than at present while growing season precipitation was 50 mm below current values during the middle Holocene.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.124

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGéographie physique et QuaternaireSame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207