Volumetric Measurements of Brain Shift Using Intraoperative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cerebrospinal fluid leakage and ventricular compression during open surgery may lead to brain deformation called brain shift. Brain shift may affect intraoperative navigation that is based on image-based preoperative planning. Tools to correct or predict these anatomic modifications can be important to maintain precision during open guided neurosurgery. OBJECTIVE: To obtain a reliable intraoperative volumetric deformation vector field describing brain shift during intracranial neurosurgical procedures. METHODS: We acquired preoperative and intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography enhanced with intravenous injection of iodine contrast. These data sets were preprocessed and elastically registered to obtain the volumetric brain shift deformation vector fields. RESULTS: We obtained the brain shift deformation vector field in 9 cases. The deformation fields proved to be highly nonlinear, particularly around the ventricles. Interpatient variability was considerable, with a maximum deformation ranging from 8.1 to 26.6 mm and a standard deviation ranging from 0.9 to 4.9 mm. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced cone-beam computed tomography provides a feasible technique for intraoperatively determining brain shift deformation vector fields. This technique can be used perioperatively to adjust preoperative planning and coregistration during neurosurgical procedures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".