DERECHOS FUNDAMENTALES EN EL SISTEMA CONSTITUCIONAL CANADIENSE: ENTRE LA CARTA CONSTITUCIONAL Y LOS CÓDIGOS PROVINCIALES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El objetivo del presente texto consiste en describir el sistema de reconocimiento y tutela de los Derechos Fundamentales en el derecho constitucional canadiense, en el que existe una carta de derechos con valor constitucional, así como una pluralidad de leyes ordinarias provinciales y federales que tratan las mismas materias. A fin de explicar este sistema de protección de derechos y de comprender mejor las interacciones en juego, particularmente del carácter federal de la constitución canadiense, el presente trabajo analiza sucesivamente la jerarquía de las normas en el sistema constitucional canadiense, la economía del reparto de competencias legislativas, estudiando después la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés para poder finalmente examinar los regímenes provinciales de protección de esos derechos y libertades. Testu honetan, Kanadako konstituzio-zuzenbidean oinarrizko eskubideak aitortzeko eta babesteko ezarritako sistema deskribatzen da; izan ere, zezenbide horrek konstituziobalioa duen eskubide-gutun bat jasotzen du, gai horri buruzko hainbat lege arrunt probintzial eta federalekin batera. Eskubideak babesteko sistema hau eta jokoan dauden interakzioak hobeto ulertzeko ¿bereziki Kanadako Konstituzioaren izaera federalarenak¿ testu honek hurrenez hurren aztertzen ditu Kanadako konstituzio-sistemako arauen hierarkia, legegintza-eskumenen banaketaren ekonomia eta, ondoren, Charte canadienne des droits et libertés gutuna eta, azkenik, eskubide eta askatasun horiek babesteko dauden araubide probintzialak. The scope of the present text is to portray the system for the recognition and protection of fundamental rights within the Canadian Constitutional law, where there is a bill of rights with constitutional force and also a plurality of provincial and federal ordinary acts that deal with the same issues. With the purpose of explaining this system for the protection of fundamental rights and for the sake¿s of a better understanding of the interactions at stake, especially the federal nature of the Canadian constitution, this work analyses successively the hierarchy of the norms in the frame of the Canadian constitutional system, the economy in the distribution of legislative competences, by then studying the Charte canadienne des droits et libertés in order to finally examine the provincial regimes for the protection of rights and liberties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".