MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

DERECHOS FUNDAMENTALES EN EL SISTEMA CONSTITUCIONAL CANADIENSE: ENTRE LA CARTA CONSTITUCIONAL Y LOS CÓDIGOS PROVINCIALES

2008· article· es· W143537392 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Vasca de Administración Pública / Herri-Arduralaritzarako Euskal Aldizkaria · 2008
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicComparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El objetivo del presente texto consiste en describir el sistema de reconocimiento y tutela de los Derechos Fundamentales en el derecho constitucional canadiense, en el que existe una carta de derechos con valor constitucional, así como una pluralidad de leyes ordinarias provinciales y federales que tratan las mismas materias. A fin de explicar este sistema de protección de derechos y de comprender mejor las interacciones en juego, particularmente del carácter federal de la constitución canadiense, el presente trabajo analiza sucesivamente la jerarquía de las normas en el sistema constitucional canadiense, la economía del reparto de competencias legislativas, estudiando después la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés para poder finalmente examinar los regímenes provinciales de protección de esos derechos y libertades. Testu honetan, Kanadako konstituzio-zuzenbidean oinarrizko eskubideak aitortzeko eta babesteko ezarritako sistema deskribatzen da; izan ere, zezenbide horrek konstituziobalioa duen eskubide-gutun bat jasotzen du, gai horri buruzko hainbat lege arrunt probintzial eta federalekin batera. Eskubideak babesteko sistema hau eta jokoan dauden interakzioak hobeto ulertzeko ¿bereziki Kanadako Konstituzioaren izaera federalarenak¿ testu honek hurrenez hurren aztertzen ditu Kanadako konstituzio-sistemako arauen hierarkia, legegintza-eskumenen banaketaren ekonomia eta, ondoren, Charte canadienne des droits et libertés gutuna eta, azkenik, eskubide eta askatasun horiek babesteko dauden araubide probintzialak. The scope of the present text is to portray the system for the recognition and protection of fundamental rights within the Canadian Constitutional law, where there is a bill of rights with constitutional force and also a plurality of provincial and federal ordinary acts that deal with the same issues. With the purpose of explaining this system for the protection of fundamental rights and for the sake¿s of a better understanding of the interactions at stake, especially the federal nature of the Canadian constitution, this work analyses successively the hierarchy of the norms in the frame of the Canadian constitutional system, the economy in the distribution of legislative competences, by then studying the Charte canadienne des droits et libertés in order to finally examine the provincial regimes for the protection of rights and liberties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.861
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.012
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it