MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1436181777 · doi:10.1353/vcr.2008.0042

Nympholepsy, Mythopoesis, and John Addington Symonds

2008· article· en· W1436181777 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian review · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLexicography and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryAncient historyArtGenealogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

meaning of the word nympholepsy has drifted in recent years towards n rrowly er tic sense. In 1989, the Oxford English Dictionary defined nymp holepsy as a state of rapture supposed to be inspired in men by nymphs; hence, an ecstasy or frenzy of emotion, esp. that inspired by something unattainable. In 2004, this meaning was supplemented by further sense of passion or desire aroused in men by young girls. In the nineteenth century, the latter, sexual meaning was unknown, and nympholepsy signified much wider and more general desire. In fact, it named spiritual condition that was one of the most important legacies of the European classical heritage to Romantic and Victorian writers: the yearning for mythopoeic connection with the natural world, coupled with the alienated sense that such connection was no longer possible. Just as Nabokov was largely responsible for the late twentieth-century under standing of nympholepsy as specific kind of sexual desire or disorder, it was Byron who established the characteristically nineteenth-century usage of the term to denote an aesthetic, emotional, or spiritual longing for unattainable beauty, love, or harmony. first nineteenth-century example given by the Oxford English Dictionary is Byron's description, in Childe Harolds Pilgrimage, of the goddess Egeria as a young Aurora of the air, / nympholepsy of some fond despair ( 181 ; IV. 115-). In his stanzas on Egeria, Byron turned the classical idea of the madness induced in men by the sighting of nymph into meta phor for the condition of alienated modernity. This Byronic understanding of nympholepsy was further developed by the Victorian essayist, historian, and travel writer John Addington Symonds. In two essays of southern travel, The Cornice (1874) and Amalfi, Paestum, Capri (1879), mythological encoun ters between men and nymphs provide focal points for Symonds s meditations on the ancient mythopoeic connection with nature and the unattainability of that connection in the modern world. Byron's stanzas on the springs of Egeria outside Rome in Canto IV, stanzas 115?19, constitute one of several exercises in the interpretation of genius loci that take place in the course of Childe Harold's pilgrimage. Byron calls the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.506
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it