MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1436181777 · doi:10.1353/vcr.2008.0042

Nympholepsy, Mythopoesis, and John Addington Symonds

2008· article· en· W1436181777 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Roslyn Jolly

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian review · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLexicography and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryAncient historyArtGenealogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

meaning of the word nympholepsy has drifted in recent years towards n rrowly er tic sense. In 1989, the Oxford English Dictionary defined nymp holepsy as a state of rapture supposed to be inspired in men by nymphs; hence, an ecstasy or frenzy of emotion, esp. that inspired by something unattainable. In 2004, this meaning was supplemented by further sense of passion or desire aroused in men by young girls. In the nineteenth century, the latter, sexual meaning was unknown, and nympholepsy signified much wider and more general desire. In fact, it named spiritual condition that was one of the most important legacies of the European classical heritage to Romantic and Victorian writers: the yearning for mythopoeic connection with the natural world, coupled with the alienated sense that such connection was no longer possible. Just as Nabokov was largely responsible for the late twentieth-century under standing of nympholepsy as specific kind of sexual desire or disorder, it was Byron who established the characteristically nineteenth-century usage of the term to denote an aesthetic, emotional, or spiritual longing for unattainable beauty, love, or harmony. first nineteenth-century example given by the Oxford English Dictionary is Byron's description, in Childe Harolds Pilgrimage, of the goddess Egeria as a young Aurora of the air, / nympholepsy of some fond despair ( 181 ; IV. 115-). In his stanzas on Egeria, Byron turned the classical idea of the madness induced in men by the sighting of nymph into meta phor for the condition of alienated modernity. This Byronic understanding of nympholepsy was further developed by the Victorian essayist, historian, and travel writer John Addington Symonds. In two essays of southern travel, The Cornice (1874) and Amalfi, Paestum, Capri (1879), mythological encoun ters between men and nymphs provide focal points for Symonds s meditations on the ancient mythopoeic connection with nature and the unattainability of that connection in the modern world. Byron's stanzas on the springs of Egeria outside Rome in Canto IV, stanzas 115?19, constitute one of several exercises in the interpretation of genius loci that take place in the course of Childe Harold's pilgrimage. Byron calls the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.007
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVictorian reviewSame topicLexicography and Language StudiesFrench-language works237,207