Bootstrapped Pivots for Means of Short and Long Memory Linear Processes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Re-sampling only once, with replacement, from the entire set of observations (without dividing them into blocks) from short or long memory linear processes, we construct direct randomized parametric and nonparametric (Studentized) pivots for the population mean. In the included numerical studies, the resulting pivots will be seen to significantly outperform the traditional t-statistic as a pivot for the population mean. Our approach to the bootstrap in this exposition is fundamentally different from the classical methods of the bootstrap that have been used when the population mean is the parameter of interest. In the latter a relatively large number of independent bootstrap sub-samples are drawn from the original data to estimate the sampling distribution of the traditional t-statistic, when the latter itself is studied in reference to making inference about the population mean. Using the approach of this paper, one does not encounter the well-known issues with bootstrapped t-statistics for dependent data. Hence, no adjustments such as block-bootstrapping are required. This is so, since the re-sampling mechanism in our introduced pivots for the population mean preserves the covariance structure of the observables in hand.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".