MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1442550046 · doi:10.14264/uql.2015.749

Efficacy of a web-based therapy program on occupational performance in children and adolescents with unilateral cerebral palsy

2015· dissertation· en· W1442550046 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sarah James

Bibliographic record

VenueThe University of Queensland · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCerebral palsyOccupational therapyActivities of daily livingPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMotor skillPhysical therapyPsychologyRigourMedicineDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Cerebral palsy (CP) is a group of non-progressive disorders of movement and posture resulting from disturbances to the developing central nervous system. Unilateral CP (UCP), or congenital hemiplegia, is the most prevalent subtype and is characterised by motor impairments lateralised to one side of the body. Due to the motor and associated impairments, individuals with UCP often experience difficulties in occupational performance. Activities of daily living (ADL) are necessary to support participation in occupational roles and enhancing ADL performance is a high priority for children with UCP and their caregivers. Current clinical practice affords children with UCP time-limited therapy, and for this reason interactive computer play has emerged as a feasible, child-active alternative to face-to-face therapy. Evidence to date however is limited to pilot studies and further studies with greater methodological rigour are required. Aim This doctoral program aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a novel, web-based therapy program, “Move it to improve it” (Mitii™), on improving occupational performance in children and adolescents with UCP. The primary objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of Mitii™ compared to standard care on enhancing ADL motor and processing skills, perceived occupational performance, upper limb function and visual perception. Secondary objectives were to (i) systematically review the psychometric properties of ADL measures for school aged children with CP; (ii) establish the reproducibility of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) in children and adolescents with UCP; (iii) investigate relationships between ADL motor and processing skills, unimanual capacity, bimanual performance and visual perception; and (iv) understand engagement in Mitii™ from the perspective of children and their caregivers. Methods A matched-pairs waitlist control randomised controlled trial was conducted between April 2012 and March 2014 in Brisbane, Australia to investigate the effectiveness of Mitii™ compared to standard care over 20 weeks in children aged 8-18 years with UCP. Participants (n=102) were matched in pairs and randomised to intervention (Mitii™) or waitlist control (standard care). Mitii™ incorporates upper limb, cognitive, visual perception and physical activities and is delivered in the home environment via an internet-connected computer. Virtual therapists create individualised programs and modify modules weekly to provide incremental challenge. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and post-intervention (20 weeks). Primary outcomes were ADL motor and processing skills (AMPS), bimanual performance (Assisting Hand Assessment; AHA), unimanual speed and dexterity (Jebsen Taylor Test of Hand Function; JTTHF) and unimanual capacity (Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function; MUUL). Secondary outcomes were perceived occupational performance (Canadian Occupational Performance Model; COPM) and visual perception (Test of Visual Perceptual Skills (non-motor) 3rd edition; TVPS-3). Results A systematic review identified the AMPS as the best available measure of ADL performance for school-aged children with CP, however the test-retest reliability had not been established in this population. A reproducibility study of the AMPS found high test-rest reliability for children with UCP (AMPS motor scale ICC=0.93; AMPS process scale ICC=0.86). Analysis of cross-sectional data revealed that 57% of variance in AMPS motor scale scores were explained by bimanual performance and unimanual capacity of the dominant upper limb. Visual sequential memory, visual closure and dominant upper limb capacity together explained 35% of the variance in AMPS process scale scores. In the RCT, participants in the intervention group completed on average 32.4 hours of Mitii™ (range 3.7-74.7 hours). After 20 weeks, AMPS motor scale scores were 0.28 logits higher in the intervention group than in the control group after adjusting for baseline scores, (95%CI=0.17, 0.39; p=<0.001) and 0.30 logits higher on the AMPS process scale (95%CI=0.19, 0.41; p=<0.001). The Mitii™ group demonstrated statistically significantly higher scores on the JTTHF dominant upper limb, COPM performance and satisfaction scales and TVPS-3 compared to the control group. These differences did not exceed levels of clinical significance. There was no significant difference between groups on the AHA or MUUL, while there was a trend towards an improvement on the JTTHF impaired upper limb (p=0.058). A qualitative study identified key themes relating to client, intervention and service provider characteristics that influenced engagement in the Mitii™ program. The novelty of the program captured children’s interest initially however motivation declined over time. Caregivers desired programs to be ‘finely tuned’ to address individual needs and strong family support was necessary to facilitate engagement. Individual strategies Conclusion In an appropriately powered RCT, Mitii™ led to significant improvements in ADL motor and processing skills, perceived occupational performance and visual perception in children with UCP. Increased speed and dexterity of the dominant upper limb following Mitii™ may reflect improvements in motor planning abilities. Mitii™ offers a web-based multimodal therapy that has potential to increase the therapy dose received by children with UCP and supplement face-to-face therapy. Clinical implementation of Mitii™ will require therapists to consider children’s physical and cognitive abilities, interests, individual goals and available family support to identify suitable participants for this mode of therapy delivery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe University of QueenslandSame topicCerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersFrench-language works237,207